PMRA known for most stringent pesticide reviews in the worldPosted: June 24, 2012

Letter to the Editor

The infestations of weeds and bugs is getting unmanageable and starting to detract from the healthy community that the pesticide-free communities thought they were achieving.
The frivolous and unenforceable municipal pesticide bylaws promoted by the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), Pesticide Free BC, Wildsight, David Suzuki and others are starting to wear thin on homeowners and city staff. The consistent themes employed by these groups – “better safe than sorry” and “we are the trusted authority” – are inferences that the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) has fallen asleep at the wheel and that their extensive and comprehensive reviews of pesticides have no credibility.

These same organizations also continue to make reference to the “many safer and better alternatives” that exist to control weeds and bugs, so why bother with the conventional “toxic” substances. These environmentalists and NGOs have never provided specific lists of lawn care products they say are harmful and continually lump all pesticides into the same “toxic” category.
A report just recently released by the PMRA, listing Canadian sales of pesticides in 2008, provides some surprising statistics. Of all pesticides sold in Canada, over 60% are for agriculture while less than two per cent are for the domestic market, which includes the lawn care products. The top 10 domestic pesticides are dominated by swimming pools and spa products. Yes that’s right: chlorine and bromine are pesticides and are regulated and reviewed for use the same way that 2,4-D is. So if these environmentalists and NGOs feel the PMRA got it wrong on pesticide reviews why are they not raising the alarm on the reviews of pesticides used in your local pool?

The truth is that the PMRA is known for the most stringent pesticide reviews in the world, and there is no need to worry about exposure to pesticides on lawns or in pools when the directions for use are followed.
The BC Special Committee on Pesticides, chaired by Kootenay East MLA Bill Bennett, listened to the experts and made the informed decision that science does not support the banning of lawn care products. It’s time that the CCS, Pesticide Free BC, Wildsight, Suzuki and municipal councillors get on with issues that really matter, like the economy, lack of jobs and rising taxes.
Paul Visentin,
Cranbrook

1. Arctic Apple threat needs to be addressed Letter to the Editor The following is a copy of...
2. Overhaul of policies, procedures and protocols protecting future SAR personnel needed Letter to the Editor It’s just under a year that...
3. Censored letter writer finds venue with e-KNOW Editor’s note: The following is a letter that was sent...
4. What areas of F will be excluded? Letter to the Editor I was very surprised to hear...