- Teck responds to Globe’s selenium article
- Canada changed today: Wilks
- McIntosh wants to give back to Cranbrook
- Jumbo is simply one more added challenge
- Hwy 3 and 93 on top 10 list for collisions with wildlife
- Horoscope for the week beginning Oct. 24
- Help this man keep wearing this bra
- Trust help spurs Rent to East Kootenay
- Fund established to help Kimberley family
- Selenium issue not new for Elk Valley residents
PMRA known for most stringent pesticide reviews in the worldPosted: June 24, 2012
Letter to the Editor
The infestations of weeds and bugs is getting unmanageable and starting to detract from the healthy community that the pesticide-free communities thought they were achieving.
The frivolous and unenforceable municipal pesticide bylaws promoted by the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), Pesticide Free BC, Wildsight, David Suzuki and others are starting to wear thin on homeowners and city staff. The consistent themes employed by these groups – “better safe than sorry” and “we are the trusted authority” – are inferences that the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) has fallen asleep at the wheel and that their extensive and comprehensive reviews of pesticides have no credibility.
These same organizations also continue to make reference to the “many safer and better alternatives” that exist to control weeds and bugs, so why bother with the conventional “toxic” substances. These environmentalists and NGOs have never provided specific lists of lawn care products they say are harmful and continually lump all pesticides into the same “toxic” category.
A report just recently released by the PMRA, listing Canadian sales of pesticides in 2008, provides some surprising statistics. Of all pesticides sold in Canada, over 60% are for agriculture while less than two per cent are for the domestic market, which includes the lawn care products. The top 10 domestic pesticides are dominated by swimming pools and spa products. Yes that’s right: chlorine and bromine are pesticides and are regulated and reviewed for use the same way that 2,4-D is. So if these environmentalists and NGOs feel the PMRA got it wrong on pesticide reviews why are they not raising the alarm on the reviews of pesticides used in your local pool?
The truth is that the PMRA is known for the most stringent pesticide reviews in the world, and there is no need to worry about exposure to pesticides on lawns or in pools when the directions for use are followed.
The BC Special Committee on Pesticides, chaired by Kootenay East MLA Bill Bennett, listened to the experts and made the informed decision that science does not support the banning of lawn care products. It’s time that the CCS, Pesticide Free BC, Wildsight, Suzuki and municipal councillors get on with issues that really matter, like the economy, lack of jobs and rising taxes.
Cranbrook senior’s book continues to captivate> Read More
Trust help spurs Rent to East Kootenay> Read More
Jumbo is simply one more added challenge> Read More
Horoscope for the week beginning Oct. 24> Read More
Teck responds to Globe’s selenium article> Read More
McIntosh wants to give back to Cranbrook> Read More
All-Candidates’ Forum Nov. 3 in Elkford> Read More
Selenium issue not new for Elk Valley residents> Read More